logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.10 2018나55584
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "No. 1" in Section 3, No. 3, No. 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "No. 1 through No. 3"; "No. 3, 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance was terminated on August 3, 2016 after the expiration of the three months (see Article 10 (5) of the Family Lease Lease Act) from that of the third, 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance"; "No. 4, 16, 5, 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance" shall be deemed as "No. 30, Jun. 30, 2016"; "No. 3 of the third, “No. 3, 2016" shall be deemed as "No. 1 to June 30, 2016"; and the main sentence of Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as the judgment of the first instance and the judgment.

2. If so, the plaintiff's principal claim and the defendant's counterclaim should be accepted within the scope of each recognition above, and each of the remaining claims should be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance court is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow