1.The part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the first instance, including any claim added at the trial, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation on this part is that "E's husband" of the 2nd judgment of the first instance court is "the deceased E (hereinafter referred to as the "son of the deceased"), "E's children" of the 16,17th judgment is "the deceased's children," and "E" of the 18th judgment is "Masan Hospital of the Korea University as Masan Tuberculosis around December 7, 2010" and "the deceased changed the "Masan Hospital as the Masan Tuberculosis (hereinafter referred to as the "the hospital of this case"), the second, third, first, first, the "E" of the 2nd judgment to "the hospital of this case," the "E" of the 3th, "the economic interest" of the 5th, "the value of economic interest" of the 6th judgment to "the deceased's children," and the "the Central Institute of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the "Central Institute of Civil Procedure") to the "Special Institute of Civil Procedure" of the 6th judgment.

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment on the claim of this case are as follows: the 3rd, 16th, 4th, 9th, 9’s “Delegation Contract by Proxy” and “the above delegation contract by Proxy” are as follows: the 3rd, 3rd, 18th, 4 and 5’s “the High Central Institute of Education,” the 3rd, 3rd, 18, 4 and 5’s “the lawsuit claiming damages” and “the above lawsuit” are as follows: the 4th, 4th, 6th and 8’s “the 190th,” each “the 4th, 190th,” and “the 920th, the Plaintiff sought from August 1, 201 to February 6, 2014)/the 921st, 7th, 7, and 8th, each of the following acts.