logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.05 2018누68126
장기요양급여비용환수결정 취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court citing the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case or adding the judgment of the plaintiffs emphasizing or adding an additional argument in the court of first instance as follows. Thus, the court citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8(2)

(1) The court of first instance did not differ from the contents alleged by the Plaintiffs in the first instance trial, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance and the second instance trial were examined, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected such assertion is justifiable. [Attachment 2] Each of the six pages 2 of the judgment of first instance and the second instance shall be deemed to be “Plaintiff Company,” and the second of the judgment shall be deemed to be “the Plaintiff Company,” and the second of the judgment shall be deemed to be “the Plaintiff Company,” respectively. The first instance judgment shall be deemed to be included in “the Plaintiff Company,” and the second of the judgment of first instance, 19, 20, 12, 12, 21, 23, 18, as “the witness,” and the third of the judgment of the court of first instance, as “the first instance and second of the judgment of first instance, 20, 19, 12, 20, 20, 20, and 20,” and 15, respectively, in the judgment of first instance.

(a) the relevant laws and regulations regarding the scope of work of the Sanitation Board are clear;

arrow