1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that "two times before June 2014 and around January 2016," "the husband of the plaintiff," "the husband of the plaintiff," "the date on which the plaintiff's husband is arrested," and "in addition, it is doubtful whether the plaintiff's assertion is true," and "in addition, it is doubtful whether the plaintiff's argument is the plaintiff's argument" in the 20th court of first instance, it is argued that the plaintiff was prosecuted with the fact that the plaintiff was involved in the slick-type system, and in the trial of the court of first instance, it is identical to the ground for the judgment of the first instance except for the change to "the plaintiff's husband was indicted with the fact that the plaintiff was involved in the slick-type system, and it is argued that the plaintiff was sentenced to a conviction after being indicted with the fact that the plaintiff's husband was affiliated with the slick-type system."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.