Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Defendant B of the facts charged of the instant case is the owner of the EPC room “EPC unemployment,” Defendant A, the nominal owner of the above PC room, and the Defendants provided the game machine using contents different from those classified by the Game Rating Board in F’s name while operating the said PC room, and recruited points acquired by unspecified multiple customers to exchange in cash using a false name box for other customers.

No one shall provide the contents of game products, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, for the distribution or use, or display or keep them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from July 23, 2010 to August 16, 2010, the Defendants conspired to install 30 computers from the above “EPC” to provide a game work “Spancom 0” and provided a game work “Spancom 2” to the location of “Spancom 0”, and provided a game work with contents different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, such as manipulating that the total amount of guns continuously emitted and that is displayed on the background screen.

(b) No one shall allow any person to gamble or perform other speculative acts using game products for profit, or leave such things to do so;

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to exchange points acquired by the said game machine on the same date, time, and place as the preceding paragraph, and if the Defendants request customers to exchange the points, they shall connect the most poor names of customers to the customers, and the above poor names of customers shall, upon receiving a request from the customers, make a game within the said PC and notify the other customers of the method of using the game machine, etc., and upon receiving a request from the customers, the points acquired by the customers by accessing the said game machine in the name of a third party.