logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.07.12 2013고정322
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. B is the owner of a game room on the first floor of Pyeongtaek-si C, and the defendant is the employee, such as guiding customers and exchanging them in the game room.

No one shall provide game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification for distribution or use, or exchange or arrange exchange or exchange or repurchase such tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as a business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant conspired with B, from the end of February 2012 to March 5, 2012, in collusion with B, set up 40 game machine devices which arbitrarily added the example and meta-type function and automatic progress function differently from the contents of the “Sea-Ma” game classified by the Game Rating Board, and had customers play the game by arbitrarily adding 10,000 won to the same game machine. After having customers play the game, the Defendant exchanged 4,500 won, which is the remainder of the amount calculated by deducting 10% of the fee for 10% for 1 unit card obtained through the game.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above B, exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products, and provided game products with contents different from the contents of the classification.

2. B is the owner of a game room on the third floor of Pyeongtaek-si D, and the defendant is the employee who instructs customers and exchange them in the game room.

No one shall provide game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification for distribution or use, or exchange or arrange exchange or exchange or repurchase such tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as a business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with B on May 20, 2012, arbitrarily performed the same function as “Whale Festal” game products classified by the Game Rating Board, differently from the contents of “Whale Festal” game products.

arrow