1. The defendant's refusal to re-appoint the plaintiff A as of March 1, 2012, and refusal to re-appoint the plaintiff B as of March 1, 201.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is an educational foundation that establishes and operates the E University (F University at the time of opening the University in 1988, but the name of F University was changed in 193) and the plaintiff A was appointed as a full-time instructor of the tourism administration department of F University on September 1, 1991, and since the appointment of the plaintiff B as an associate professor of the social welfare administration department, the plaintiff B as an associate professor of the E University Broadcasting Press Department on March 1, 2002, and the plaintiff C as an associate professor of the E University on March 1, 199, and since the appointment as a full-time instructor of the film arts department of the E University on March 1, 199.

B. On March 1, 2006, Plaintiff A determined the employment period as of February 28, 201, and Plaintiff B determined the employment period as of March 1, 2009 by February 28, 201, and Plaintiff C concluded a contract for employment with each Defendant by setting the employment period as of October 1, 2006 by February 28, 201.

C. The Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff A on July 7, 2009, but on September 28, 2009, the Appeal Commission for Teachers revoked the dismissal.

The defendant was dismissed on November 20, 2009 against the above plaintiff, but on March 16, 2010, the Appeal Committee for Teachers revoked the dismissal again.

Although the Defendant was dismissed on July 23, 2010 against the Plaintiff, the Defendant was sentenced to the judgment that the dismissal on November 4, 2011 was null and void from the claim suit (Tgu District Court Decision 2010Gahap1180) filed by the said Plaintiff, and the Defendant’s appeal and appeal were all dismissed, and the third dismissal became null and void due to the final judgment of the first instance court on January 29, 2013.

The Defendant dismissed Plaintiff B and C on March 17, 2010, respectively. However, the lower court rendered a judgment that each of the above dismissal dispositions was null and void on September 22, 2011 from the claim suit (Ulsan District Court 2010Gahap3052) filed by the said Plaintiffs, such as confirmation of invalidity, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 12, 2012, and thus, each of the above dismissal dispositions became null and void.

E. The Defendant, and the Plaintiff A, prior to the expiration of the term of appointment, on November 6, 201.