beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendants of the 2017 Highest 984, on February 3, 2017, the short-term tourism visa (the expiration date of stay):
5.4.) Between a line and a post-mark that has resided in the same area as those of the foreigners of YE who entered Korea.
1. On April 9, 201, around 10:01, the Defendants committed the joint crime committed by the Defendants: (a) up to the “F operated by the victim E (42) in the North Korean elderly group,” and entered the said place as a customer; (b) on the part of the Defendants, the Defendants committed the joint crime committed by the Defendants, committed a theft of the victim’s property by leaving the victim’s property jointly with the Defendants, with the two owners of the victim, who were displayed in the display stand using the cresh that caused negligence in surveillance by the victims.
From the same date to April 13, 2017, the Defendants, together, stolen the victims’ property amounting to the total amount of KRW 1,748,990 in the market price on nine occasions, as shown in the list of offenses committed in the attached Table.
2. On April 9, 2017, Defendant B [Intrusion on and thief] caused cosmetics operated by the victim H(I, 50 years of age) located in Daegu-gu G on April 15:16, 201, the Defendant invadedd into the above shop for the purpose of stealing cosmetics, and stolen cosmetics in the sum of the market prices of 87,000 won in the victim’s possession, including two cream, two cream and two cream and two cream and one cream and one cream, which were displayed in the display stand by using any creb in which surveillance was neglected by the victim.
On April 9, 2017, the Defendants of the 2017 Highest 1058, called “L” clothes shop operated by the victim K in Daegu-gu, Seogu, and entered the said shop as a customer. Defendant A her clicked the victim with the victim’s horse and thereby his surveillance over the victim was neglected, Defendant B stolen the victim’s Titts, and Defendant B conspiredd with the victim to steals the victim’s horse when the victim’s surveillance was neglected.