A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 6. 6. 20:40경 인천 서구 C빌딩 앞에서 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서부경찰서 D지구대 소속 E 경사에게 폭행의 현행범인으로 체포되어 E 경사가 운전하는 F 순찰차의 뒷좌석에 탑승하여 위 지구대로 연행되던 중 E 경사에게 ‘풀어라 씨발놈들아, 니들 어디 살어, 죽인다’라고 욕설을 하면서 발로 순찰차의 운전석 목받침을 2회 걷어차고, 계속하여 같은 날 20:44경 인천 서구 완정로 181에 있는 D지구대에서 위 E 경사가 피고인의 신원을 확인하기 위하여 다가가자 갑자기 발로 피해자의 배 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (the decision of sentence] is not good. However, the fact that the crime is recognized and depth is divided, there is no record of crime exceeding the fine, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case and the result thereof, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as the order.