A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:10 on January 23, 2016, around 2016, the Defendant: (b) Dashe was under the influence of alcohol in the front of the voluntary crime prevention patrol vehicle, which was parked in order to build a road; (c) Dashe was spicking a vehicle blick and flicking, etc.; and (d) the slope E belonging to the D Zone Unit of the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station, which was called upon in receipt of the report, asked the victim about the situation where Dashe was the victim; and (d) the Defendant was said to go to the police blick F.

Accordingly, when the above E slope was removed from the Defendant, the Defendant expressed the above E Assistant to the above E Assistants “I Y, Dog, Dog, Dog, Dog, Dog, Dog, Dog to be a well-known person inside the D Zone,” and Dogging the above E slope in order to keep a cell phone back and see the Dog-ro, and laid off off the clothes, and laid off the above E slope to the above E slope, and caused the mobile phone to have a cost of 120,000 won of the repair cost due to the damage on the ground by a liquid lugal ju, which was cited by the above E slope.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers with regard to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes, and damaged the mobile phone at the market price of the above E-owned.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of each legal statement of witness E, G, F, and H

1. The Defendant alleged that he did not take a bath or walk to E slope, and did not intentionally destroy a mobile phone of E slope, even if he was at the time carried the door and the clothes of the door and the door, and did not intentionally throw the door to E slope.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant can be found to have expressed a bath to E slope as stated in the facts constituting the crime.

In addition, at the time, the defendant and E slope were at a close distance of about one meter, and E slope was a mobile phone to collect evidence.