logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.08.09 2016고단2164
공문서변조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Alteration of an official document;

A. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant, at his/her office located in Seocho-si B, contained a “written reply in compliance with a request to issue an administrative disposition certificate,” which is an official document issued by Namyang-si, in order to make a tender to the head from sunrise to sunset, and then changed the “date specified in the new document” into “date 29, 2015” as “date 09, 2015.”

For the purpose of exercising, the defendant modified the response letter according to the request for issuance of administrative disposition certificate, which is a document in South-Yyang-gu.

B. On February 2016, the Defendant changed the “written reply following a request for issuance of a written confirmation of administrative disposition,” which is an official document issued by the Namyang-ju market price, from the same place as the above in the foregoing paragraph (a) to “the date of February 29, 2016” as “the date of February 02, 2016.”

For the purpose of exercising, the defendant modified the response letter according to the request for issuance of administrative disposition certificate, which is a document in South-Yyang-gu.

2. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) issued two copies of the “written reply following a request for the issuance of administrative disposition confirmation”, which is an official document of Yangyang-si, Namyang-si, the alteration of which was modified, at the apartment management office of the apartment complex 7 in the vicinity of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; and (b) issued them to the employee in charge of the said fact as if the written reply was duly completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. E statements;

1. Fact-finding on documents issued with a written confirmation for administrative disposition;

1. Responses following a request to issue a written confirmation of each administrative disposition;

1. The application of the provisions of the Act and subordinate statutes to inquiries;

1. The point of altering each official document in the judgment of the court in question on criminal facts: The point of uttering of each altered official document in the judgment of the court in Article 225 of the Criminal Act: Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following circumstances considered as favorable among the reasons for sentencing) 1.

arrow