logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.07.18 2018고단2390
공문서변조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who serves as the head of planning office in B.

1. On December 15, 2016, the Defendant altered official documents without authority for the purpose of exercising them at the office B office located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seoul, and without authority. On December 14, 2016, the part of “1” and “one case of administrative disposition (one first business suspension)” in the column of the number of administrative dispositions in the official document in the name of the chief of the police station of the Daegu, Seo-gu, which was issued and held by the chief of the police station of the police station of the Daegu, Seo-gu, which was issued on December 14, 2016. The Defendant copied the portion of “0” and “not having any administrative disposition” in the remarks column of the number of administrative dispositions in the official document issued previously.

Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, the official document under the name of the head of the Daegu Western Police Station, the Defendant altered one copy of the “Notice of Fact-finding as to the existence of an administrative disposition by a guard company.”

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, submitted an altered official document to an employee in the name of the Daegu-gu dong-gu apartment management office through a public official in charge of the name-oriented employees of the company B, who is unaware of the fact that there was an administrative disposition by the guard company under the name of the head of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station in question.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the altered official document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. (B) the application of the Act and subordinate statutes on the request for investigation, the altered official document photographs, the true “written notice of confirmation of facts as to the existence of administrative disposition by the guard company”

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (a point of altered official documents), Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of modified official documents);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;

arrow