logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.12.13. 선고 2019도14973 판결
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영인정된죄명:성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)미수]
Cases

2019Do14973 Violation of the Special Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Use of Cameras, etc.)

Name of crime recognized to be taken: Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes

Violation of the Act (Attempted Use and Screening of Cameras)

Defendant

A

Appellant

Prosecutor

The judgment below

Suwon District Court Decision 2019No3313 Decided October 4, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

December 13, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty on the grounds that there was no proof as to the fact that the instant facts charged constituted the crime, and rendered a not guilty verdict on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, and determined that only the attempted violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (ameras, etc.) included in the instant facts charged was convicted. Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment

The Prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but did not state the grounds of objection in the petition of appeal or the appellate brief concerning the guilty portion.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Judges

Justices Min Il-young

Chief Justice Cho Jae-hee

Justices Kim Jae-in

Justices Lee Jae-hwan

arrow