logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.12.24. 선고 2016도9704 판결
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Cases

2016Do9704 Violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products

Defendant

1. A;

2. B

3. C

4. D;

Appellant

Prosecutor

The judgment below

Gwangju District Court Decision 2015No1361 Decided June 14, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

December 24, 2019

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting Defendants on the part of violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products, and sentenced them not guilty. Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “an act of selling under disguised origin” under Article 6(1)3 of the former Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products (Amended by Act No. 14291, Dec. 2, 2016).

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Judges

Justices Min Il-young

Chief Justice Cho Jae-hee

Justices Kim Jae-in

Justices Lee Jae-hwan

arrow