logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.2.21. 선고 2016도21391 판결
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Cases

2016Do21391 Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Use of Cameras, etc.)

(Recording)

Defendant

A

Appellant

Prosecutor

Defense Counsel

Law Firm (LLC) B

Attorney C, J, K, L

The judgment below

Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2016No700 Decided December 1, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

February 21, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court reversed the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case on the grounds that there was no proof of crime.

Examining the record, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable. In so doing, it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Judges

Justices Park Sang-hoon

Justices Kim Jae-tae

Chief Justice Cho Jae-hee

Justices Park Sang-ok

arrow