Cases
2016Do21391 Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Use of Cameras, etc.)
(Recording)
Defendant
A
Appellant
Prosecutor
Defense Counsel
Law Firm (LLC) B
Attorney C, J, K, L
The judgment below
Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2016No700 Decided December 1, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
February 21, 2017
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court reversed the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case on the grounds that there was no proof of crime.
Examining the record, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable. In so doing, it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Judges
Justices Park Sang-hoon
Justices Kim Jae-tae
Chief Justice Cho Jae-hee
Justices Park Sang-ok