(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.24 2018나2044860

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.24 2018나2044860

물품대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The defendant of the purport of the claim shall make the plaintiff 382,193.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications:

[Revision] Part 8 of the second sentence of the first instance court's judgment "the plaintiff's raw resin products" is "the plaintiff's raw resin products".

The provision of the above commodity supply contract to the 2nd to 13th of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows.

The term "the above commodity supply contract" refers to "the price for the goods according to the contract of this case" and "the price for the goods according to the contract of this case" in Part 3 of the first instance judgment of "the price for the goods of this case" in Part 9 of the third instance judgment of "the request".

Following the "each evidence set forth in Section 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance", the part of the "No. 13" was added to the "No. 12 through No. 15, and the part of the "No. 12 through No. 15" is as follows. ① The plaintiff issued a tax invoice to the defendant regarding the total amount of the price of the goods of this case. Accordingly, the defendant issued the tax invoice to the defendant in the future of the company G operated by D, and the defendant issued the same amount of the tax invoice to the defendant." The "each evidence submitted by the defendant" of No. 15 through No. 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. In light of the whole purport of each statement and argument set forth in Section 15 through No. 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance, it is difficult to believe that part of No. 22, No. 3, No. 5, No. 13, No. 4-1 of the evidence No. 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows:

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2019.06.12 2018나2042536

-서울고등법원 2019.08.22 2018누75100

-서울고등법원 2020.10.16 2020누43274

-서울고등법원 2020.05.15 2019누61146

-서울고등법원 2019.07.24 2018나2057361