1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case mentioned in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the second sentence, 6, 7, 5, and 6 of the 3rd sentence, “K” shall be deemed “L” respectively.

B. On the 2nd page of the first instance judgment, the “F All Sports Park” in the first instance judgment is regarded as “M All Sports Park”.

C. On the 3rd page of the first instance judgment, the Defendant’s “Defendant” is deemed to be “Plaintiff”, and “Defendant” is deemed to be “Plaintiff”, respectively.

On the third side of the first instance judgment, the defendant's "the defendant" in the first instance judgment shall be deemed to be "the plaintiff".

E. From Nos. 4, 11 to 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be followed.

"Therefore, the land of this case is presumed to have been purchased by the owner or to have been compensated for the owner in establishing the J reservoir (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 93Da42696, Feb. 10, 195). The shipbuilding General Self-Governing Province at the time of conducting the second emergency expansion project for the land of this case, and the Plaintiff’s age is seven years of age at the time of performing the second emergency expansion project, and the evidence Nos. 9-1 through 4, evidence No. 9-1, 2, and evidence No. 12-1, 13-1, 2, evidence No. 14-1, 2, and 15-1, and 2 of the evidence No. 13-1, 14-1, and 15-2 are insufficient to reverse the above presumption. Therefore, the Defendant’s registration of the ownership of the land

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.