1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part concerning Defendant A, C, H, I, J, K, and L, including the claims expanded in the trial:

1. Basic facts

A. Each building listed in the separate sheet No. 1 is a commercial building owned by the Republic of Korea. The Plaintiff obtained permission for use from the Republic of Korea from June 3, 1998 to July 9, 2013 as to each of the above buildings, and obtained permission for use free of charge from the leisure market, which is the managing authority of each of the above buildings, from July 2, 2013 to July 9, 2016.

The portion of the Defendant’s portion (Attachment 2 Appraisal Standards) deposit and monthly rent (unit A: KRW 5,00,000, KRW 550,000, KRW 1800, KRW 165,000, KRW 16000, KRW 21,000, KRW 253,000, KRW 000, KRW 253,000, KRW 000, KRW 000, KRW 352,000, KRW 350,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 052,000, KRW 00, KRW 15,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 70, KRW 000, KRW 08,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 552,000, KRW 100,000, KRW 08,000, KRW 300,00.

B. On March 30, 2012, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement on each of the above buildings (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) with the Defendants, setting the term of lease from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013, as indicated in the following table:

Some lease contracts are changed after the conclusion of the lease contract, and it is finally changed.

C. The Defendants paid to the Plaintiff the rent under each of the instant lease agreements only up to July 2013, and up to now, occupied and used each of the relevant leased premises.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 through 13, 18 through 27 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants for the delivery, etc. of each of the leased premises of this case.