beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, respectively.
However, as to Defendant B and C, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B are between the line and the rear line that they came to know in the society, and F is the latter part of Defendant B’s dong, and Defendant C is the taxi driver.
Defendant
A caused Defendant B to see the light of the mobile phone, leading the taxi engineer, and had the leading taxi engineer purchase the portable phone using a method (the string method) to buy the mobile phone at the low price of the passengers he acquired from the leading taxi engineer, and F, upon the request of Defendant B, led the taxi by harming the light of the mobile phone.
1. On March 20, 2016, around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) obtained a victim’s cell phone 6 carrying phone from the Defendant’s G Dota-si taxi that was occupied by the Defendant’s passenger from the G Dona-si in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) embezzled the Defendant’s thought that he/she had without following necessary procedures, such as returning to the victim; and (c) embezzled it.
2. On February 2, 2016, Defendant A: (a) told B, a man of the society, that “I would like to take a Si gold (on the mobile phone purchase cost) and hand off the phone obtained by a taxi engineer; and (b) induced B to have B, “I would purchase a mobile phone obtained by a taxi engineer,” and had B acquire a cab using “swaying method,” and let B acquire a cab carried phone, which is a stolen article obtained by a taxi engineer.
The Defendant, at around 02:25 on March 24, 2016, ordered B and F to purchase a taxi engineer, as described in paragraph 1, before the “J” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, by knowing that C, a taxi engineer, was a stolen and stolen article, and from February 1, 2016, the Defendant had a police officer know that C, a taxi engineer, was a stolen article.
3. Until December 24, 200, each victims acquired the stolens by purchasing the hand phone of each victims on three occasions, such as the attached list of crimes.
3. Defendant B stolen a taxi engineer from Defendant A, who was a member of the society, as described in paragraph (2), at the lower court’s lower court on February 2016.