logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2012.12.12 2012고단1314
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 24, 2012 by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud and a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2012.

No person shall perform any act of smoking marijuana seed coats.

Nevertheless,

1. On February 2, 2012, around 24:00 to 01:00, the Defendant smoked marijuana in a way that added to the “mariju Tobacco (Lighting: Lighting)” containing approximately 0.5g of the trade name of the head of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, where the trade name of the head of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office is unknown and added to the “mariju Tobacco (Lighting (Lighting: Lighting)” and affixed it to the “mariju”.

2. At around 01:00 on March 2, 2012, the Defendant smoked marijuana by attaching to one “mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-s

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each investigation report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes notifying the results of narcotics appraisal;

1. Article 61 (1) 4 (a) and subparagraph 10 (a) of Article 3 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, etc., concerning criminal facts: Selection of imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. are as follows: (a) the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it; (b) the defendant could have been tried at the same time as before the judgment became final and conclusive; and (c) all of the sentencing conditions in the pleading

arrow