Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2015Nu35996 ( January 14, 2016)
Title
(1) If, unless it is presumed that the donation has been made, the taxpayer who claims that there has been any other purpose than the donation must prove that there has been any other purpose.
Summary
(C) In light of the above legal principles, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the presumption of good faith, and by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the presumption of good faith.
Related statutes
Article 2 (Gift Tax Taxables) of Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act
Cases
2016Du34103 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
Z Kim
Defendant-Appellee
YThe director of the tax office
original adjudication determination
Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu35996 Decided January 14, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
January 14, 2006
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal do not include the grounds provided in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal of Supreme Court or are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.