logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 10. 04. 선고 2018두46872 판결
(심리불속행) 증여자로 인정된 자 명의의 예금이 납세자 명의 예금계좌로 예치된 경우 증여 추정 및 임의 인출의 경우 추정 번복 사유인지 여부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu65946 (Law No. 16, 2018)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2016-Seoul Government-2527 (2016.30)

Title

(C) Whether the presumption of donation and the presumption of reversal in the case of voluntary withdrawals are applicable to a person whose name is recognized as a donor;

Summary

(Summary of the Supreme Court Decision 201Do1148 delivered on May 1, 201, 201; 201Do1366 delivered on July 2, 201, etc., on January 201, 201

Related statutes

Article 45 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (Presumption of Donation of Funds for Property Acquisition)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and it is therefore dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow