Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B is punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant C is punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s violation of the Employment Security Act from April 2012 to December 2014, 2014: (a) provided free job placement service using a female entertainment drinking club with the name of “L” and “J” in the name of “J” and “L” in the name of “J”, and (b) received an introduction fee of KRW 20,000 per contact loan.

2. Defendant A operated an entertainment drinking house under the trade name of “N essential point” in Ma of Seongdong-gu, Jeonju-si, and offered 20,000 won per man from male descendants who wish to provide a sexual intercourse with the entertainment reception receptionist, and paid 180,000 won among them to the above entertainment receptionist visitors, and had them do sexual intercourse with male descendants, and Defendant B, C, and D are called the “marin” in the above entertainment drinking club, while taking charge of the management of customers and entertainment receptionist, and brokerage of sexual intercourse between customers and entertainment receptionist and entertainment receptionist, Defendant B, C, and D agreed to arrange sexual intercourse in a way that male grandchildren have 30% of the drinking value.

Accordingly, on October 23, 2014, Defendant A and D requested sexual intercourse with the said male grandchildren in return for sexual intercourse, other than the drinking value, by two male grandchildren, after drinking alcoholic beverages together with the name "O" and "P", Defendant A and D demanded that the said male grandchildren have sexual intercourse with the said male grandchildren in the entertainment drinking room near the entertainment drinking house.

In addition, the Defendants sold alcohol to male grandchildren and arranged sexual traffic with entertainment receptioners by the aforementioned method, as shown in the list of crimes, from around that time to December 15, 2014.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's office against the Defendants.