logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고정1328
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the business owner of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the 1st underground floor "E", and Defendant B is an employee who pays the drinking value including the price of sexual traffic from the customers in the above main shop and distributes part of the sexual traffic price to the entertainment receptionr, and Defendant C and F are the head of the office who manages the entertainment receptionr by belonging to the above business establishment.

From April 6, 2015, Defendants and F conspired to employ G, H, and I, etc. as an entertainment entertainment source and had such female enter into an entertainment entertainment relationship with their customers on April 7, 2015, while engaging in the business of arranging them to engage in secondary sexual traffic with their customers, Defendants and F received KRW 970,00 won per head in return for alcoholic beverages and commercial sex acts (sexual traffic price of KRW 2.50,000 per head in 2.5 billion) from J and K as an entertainment entertainment place at the above entertainment place at the above entertainment place at around 22:08 on the same day, and after having them sit in entertainment as an entertainment entertainment place at the above entertainment place at around 402, G and J, 403, and after having them attend the entertainment place at the above entertainment place at around 21:0, the agreement was made to have the said entertainment relationship between G and H and 250,000 won for the said entertainment and 250,000 won.

As a result, Defendants and F conspired to commit acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each prosecutor's office concerning G, N, I, H, and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect to J or K;

1. Each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs showing the control of sexual traffic;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines, respectively.

1. Defendants detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation;

A. Defendant B: Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant C:

arrow