1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with C vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with D vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

나. 이 사건 사고의 발생 원고 차량은 2018. 11. 9. 12:25경 대구 달성군 E건물 앞 ‘ㅏ’자형 삼거리를 편도 3차로 중 3차로를 따라 직진하다가 소로에서 대로로 우회전하면서 진입하던 피고 차량의 앞 범퍼 부분과 원고 차량의 조수석 뒷문쪽 부분이 충격하는 사고가 발생하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). C.

On December 11, 2018, the Plaintiff paid KRW 9,417,000 (excluding KRW 500,000 of the self-paid contributions of the insured) as insurance money, in total, with the repair cost, etc. of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5, Eul's 1 through 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence found in the above facts based on the negligence ratio, it is recognized that the accident of this case occurred due to the defendant's driver's main negligence because the defendant's vehicle bypassing from the road to the road without properly examining the traffic situation as soon as possible.

다만, 이 사건 사고가 발생한 장소는 ‘ㅏ’자형 삼거리로서 당시 원고 차량 운전자는 위 삼거리를 진행하고 있었으므로 전방주시의무를 다하면서 안전하게 운전하여야 할 주의의무가 있음에도 이를 게을리 한 잘못이 있고, 이러한 원고 차량 운전자의 과실 또한 이 사건 사고의 한 원인이 되었다고 볼 수 있다.

Furthermore, in light of the developments leading up to the instant accident, road status, and the conflict side, it is reasonable to view that the fault ratio is 20% of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and 80% of the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. The plaintiff paid within the scope of compensation.