Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

G church located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is divided into 15 pages, and 9 pages and 6 pages that understand the positions of H pastors who have filed a criminal charge of embezzlement and breach of trust, other than the case that is a pastors before the G church, and 2 strikes.

At around 14:00 on August 20, 2016, the G church labor union opened a presiding judge on the third floor of the J church located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I and requested the attendance of nine heads to be present.

Defendant

A is a member of a trial court, Defendant B and Victim K are the chief of the accusation against the pastor, and the victim L is the H pastor.

1) Defendant A had the victim K (59 tax) go beyond the victim’s bridge on the ground that the victim’s disturbance was avoided at the place of the above Japan’s border. Defendant A had the victim go beyond the victim’s bridge.

In this respect, the victim caused the victim to suffer brain-dead, sulphal salt, sulphal dye, and dystrophal sule.

2) Defendant B’s Defendant B told the victim L (51) at the place of the above day-to-day border to avoid disturbance.

The reason is that there is no misunderstanding of the post-speaker.

The term "the victim was tightly read, and the victim was pushed by hand and hand."

In this respect, the victim caused the victim to engage in climatics, climatics, and tensions that require two weeks of treatment period.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness L and M;

1. Photographs of the victim K;

1. An optician;

1. A medical certificate submitted by K for victims;

1. A medical certificate of injury submitted by a victim L;

1. CCTV images produced by the victim L [Defendant B did not exercise tangible power, such as smuggling L, and even if having gone through smuggling, it constitutes a legitimate act, and does not constitute injury requiring medical treatment;

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the fact that the victim's statement is consistent with the background, process, method, and ex post facto circumstances of the occurrence of the instant case and that the medical certificate supporting the said statement is submitted.