logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.09.19 2014고정25
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A, Defendant B, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant I, Defendant J, and Defendant J.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants entered into an employment contract with the victim AM (compet) companies located in the former metropolitan bus service center located in the Seoul metropolitan bus center of the Democratic Nowon-gu Seoul metropolitan transportation labor union branch (hereinafter “victim company”) and were employed as the bus officers on April 13, 2013. On April 13, 2013, the Defendants received text messages from the Defendants to “the case where the representative director of AO and the chairperson of the AP committee at the Jeonju area AP committee, Q Q, etc., of the members AP committee belonging to the above union members of AP committee for the purpose of holding a meeting at the level of a clause on the “case where the AP committee members of the above union members of the former city are flabing, etc., with the aim of holding a meeting at the level of a clause on the “case where the AP committee members of the above union members of the former city are flab,” which sent to the Defendants around that time, received the text messages of the organization from

The Defendants conspired with NN on April 13, 2013, NN sent text messages to the Defendants, with the direction of AS and use the computer, such as “AP AP AP AP A Q Q-con-con-Aids, 14:0:0:0:0:0:0:00::00: (a) from 14:0 to 15:30:0:00 to 15:00:0:00::00::00 to 15:0:0:0:0::00; and (b) on the bus of each company, the 15:30:0:0:0:00:00,0000,0000,0000 won; and (c) the Defendants, in response to this, caused a total loss of transportation revenue of KRW 3,811,270,000, to the victims by neglecting the operation courses specified in the attached

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with NN and interfered with bus operation business of the victimized company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A complaint;

1. Statement of the police statement related to AT;

1. Bus operation records of each suspect;

1. Investigation report (report on the binding of data on calculation of the amount of loss for transportation revenues);

1. Each investigation report (a summary of video recording) Act and subordinate statutes;

arrow