logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.05 2017누76779
국가유공자등록거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this part of the disposition is stated by the court are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance from No. 2 to No. 34). Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion in light of the Plaintiff’s past medical record, etc., the instant wounds occurred in connection with the Plaintiff’s performance of official duties. At the time, the complex Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Ma, and there was a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s performance of official duties and the instant wounds occurred between the Plaintiff before June 29, 2012.

Therefore, the Plaintiff should be registered as a person of distinguished service to the State, and even if the instant wound is not a ground for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State, the Plaintiff at least has proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s performance of military duties and the instant wound.

arrow