1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On June 19, 198, while serving in the Army on the part of the Plaintiff, the circumstances leading up to the disposition were different from the signboards escape certificate (L4-5, L5-S1) (hereinafter “instant No. 1 award”) and the number of pages (hereinafter “the instant No. 2 award”). On March 18, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State. However, on September 12, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff does not meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the military duty (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, Eul 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. During the Plaintiff’s alleged military service, the Plaintiff was frequently hospitalized in an association’s stage as the Plaintiff moved to or was subject to heavy gambling. As the Plaintiff was suffering from the Nos. 1 and 2 of this case.

In light of these circumstances, the instant disposition is unlawful even if proximate causal relation is acknowledged between the first, second and the military service.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 국가유공자 등 예우 및 지원에 관한 법률 제4조(적용 대상 국가유공자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 국가유공자, 그 유족 또는 가족(다른 법률에서 이 법에 규정 된 예우 등을 받도록 규정된 사람을 포함한다)은 이 법에 따른 예우를 받는다.

6. 공상군경 : 군인이나 경찰ㆍ소방 공무원으로서 국가의 수호ㆍ안전보장 또는 국민의 생명ㆍ재산 보호와 직접적인 관련이 있는 직무수행이나 교육훈련 중 상이(질병을 포함한다)를 입고 전역하 거나 퇴직한 사람으로서 그 상이정도가 국가보훈처장이 실시하는 신체검사에서 상이등급으로 판정된 사람 ▣ 보훈보상대상자 지원에 관한 법률 제2조(적용 대상 보훈보상대상자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는...