Text
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. The Defendants and Defendant F’s partial takeover intervenor are as shown in the attached Table 1 List 3 and 3.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The land partitioning U 165 square meters (hereinafter “the land before division”) is omitted when indicating the location of the land, barring any special circumstance.
(2) On July 9, 1975, AC large 117 square meters and P large 48 square meters were divided. On the same day, AC large 117 square meters were divided into AC large 56 square meters (185 square meters), AD large 3 square meters (10 square meters), S large 7 square meters (23 square meters, 23 square meters, and 14 square meters), AE large 7 square meters (23 square meters, and 185 square meters. 2) AC large 185 square meters was divided into AC large 174 square meters and AG road 11 square meters on May 26, 1986, and P large 48 square meters was divided into 149 square meters and AH road 10 square meters on the same day.
3) On October 22, 1996, the AF large 145 square meters was divided into a 138 square meters and an AI large 7 square meters. 4) Plux 149 square meters were divided into a 125 square meters and a AJ large 24 square meters on July 28, 2001.
5) On July 31, 2001, AC large 174 square meters was divided into a AC large 106 square meters, AK large 2 square meters, and AL large 66 square meters. B. The ownership of land was completed in the name of AM andN on December 14, 1965.
2) On the ground, AM andN have designated a market building on the land before subdivision: 29, 27, 30, 6, 53, 37, 33, 36, 32, 34, 31, and 29 in sequence; 23 square meters including the passenger, tea, car, passenger's weight, and 44, 51, 50, 56, 48, 27, 46, 43, 40, 38, 38, and 5 in sequence with AO on the land before subdivision; 3,00,00 among the above-mentioned sections: 1,4, 13, 51, 50, 53, 40, 40, 38, 37, 36, 36, 36, 32, 36, 32, 36, 34, 129, 129, 25, 1, 4, 1, 20