logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.01.21 2013고단3071
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:50 on November 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the Defendant, who was a victim C while getting in front of the Busan Southern-gu B apartment, Busan-gu B apartment on the front of the Defendant, and assaulted the victim by generating the back part of the victim’s backline.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. The Defendant, at the same time and place as stated in Paragraph 1, was arrested by F, who was arrested by the Assistant E belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station and was called for a flagrant offender at the same time and place as stated in Paragraph 1, and stated F’s personal information while working in F, and submitted a letter of arrest of F, who was arrested by F, under the same circumstances as described in Paragraph 1, and marked “F” in the confirmation column, and marked his own seal next to it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender in F, a private document related to a certificate of fact.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, issued a written confirmation of the arrest of a flagrant offender, which was forged, to E, a police officer who is aware of the forgery, as described in the foregoing Paragraph 1, as if it were a document duly formed.

3. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On November 3, 2013, around 08:30, the Defendant investigated as a suspect in the case of assault as stated in paragraph (1) at the Busan Southern-dong 3, Busan-dong 243-29 Busan Southern Police Station criminal case, and entered F’s name in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged F’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

B. The Defendant, at the same date, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a) above, issued a forged protocol of interrogation of a suspect who was signed by F, to G in the Busan Southern Police Station that was aware of the forgery, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of written confirmation (F) and protocol of suspect examination (F)-related statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow