logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고단2264
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

Victims 1, 3 through 6 (Trat Card) shall each be the victim.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On March 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court (Seoul Western District Court), and on July 9, 2015, the Seoul Southern District Court completed the execution of the sentence.

[Criminal facts]

1. Larceny and intrusion into a thief;

A. On April 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a door prior to the F University No. 1 No. 1550, which was managed by the victim E in Seoul, on April 2017, the Defendant committed the crime; (b) opened a door that was not corrected by theft of money and valuables; and (c) intrudes into the first public school hall; and (d) down the third floor with the stairs, the Defendant stolen 50,000 won in cash and T-MNE Card (credit card number: G) within the wall owned by the victim C, within which the door of the urban engineering department was not corrected.

B. On July 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a door, which was not corrected by the victim I, in front of the second art museum of the JA, managed by the victim I in Seoul, on July 29, 2017; and (b) intruded into the second art museum of the JA, which was in force by the victim I; and (c) stolen KRW 38,000 in cash within the wall owned by the victim I, and KRW 30,000 in cash within the wall owned by the victim I, which was in force of the second art museum.

2. On August 4, 2017, the Defendant acquired a copy of T-MNE Card (N: card number) that was owned by the victim M in the Han River Park in the Han River Park in the Dong-ro 330 of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Each letter of K, L and M, and each letter of prosecution;

1. A photograph of seized articles and output on the homepage (J.C.);

arrow