logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고단8394
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 31, 2014, at around 01:24, the Defendant intruded the victim D’s “E Child Care Center” in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, with the entrance of the first floor that was not corrected, up to the first floor office, and stolen the said victim’s cash owned by the said victim, with one home smartphone amounting to KRW 55,00,000, market price of KRW 200,000.

2. On November 5, 2014, at least 01:48, the Defendant intruded into the classroom through the second floor window that was not corrected beyond the fence, and stolen it with one victim D’s share of the market price equivalent to KRW 50,000, and two Internet share of which the market price is unknown, one USB store, and one USB store.

3. On November 7, 2014, the Defendant tried to open and intrude the second floor window beyond the victim’s D’s wall to steals the objects owned by the Defendant at the above “E Child Care Center” around 02:00. However, the Defendant did not commit an attempted attempt on the wind where the window of the said second floor is corrected.

4. Around September 2014, the Defendant, on the front side of “G Mana,” located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F, embezzled the property that he would have, without following necessary procedures, take on the part of the victim, such as returning it to the victim, even though he/she acquired one string of the card containing 12 card, such as T members but his/her membership card, etc., and then he/she embezzled the property that he/she had, on his/her idea, left from the possession of the victim.

5. On October 26, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the property that he/she would have, without following necessary procedures such as returning it to the victim, he/she did not take a necessary procedure, even though he/she found one of the card containing 14 card, such as a name tag, NAfrocer card, Samsung Card, etc., that the victim lost in his/her name due to the loss of the victim in the name, at a non-claimed land of not more than 5-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1.Each.

arrow