The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged is as follows: D carpet operated by C on December 10, 2015 by the Defendant on December 19:15, 2015, and the victim E in his mother-child house.

B. Whether the victim “this wale, this year h. H. B. B. A. B. B. L. B. L. B. A. B. L. B. B. L. B. B. L. B. L. B. B. L. B. B. L. B. B. L. B. B. L. B. L. B.D.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the large interest of "nicking with eating a bridge bottle, etc.".

Judgment

The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a criminal complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the written agreement prepared by the complainant E which is bound in the public trial records, the complainant E may recognize the fact that the complainant revoked the complaint against the defendant on January 28, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Thus, the above facts charged constitute a case where a public prosecution can be instituted only upon a complaint, and thus the public prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.