The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a facility director of the meeting of representatives of apartment occupant B, the window of Changwon-si, and C, the complainant, is the chairman.

On October 17, 2017, from October 17, 2017 to 09:30 of the same day, the Defendant refers to the complainant at the conference room of the apartment management office in the window B of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and “I must do so. Whether I will pay audit allowances without going through the representatives of occupants.

Along with the fact that “I am ...”, the complainant publicly insultingd the complainant.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are acts falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which may be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

On March 20, 2018, after the indictment of this case, the complainant submitted a written agreement to revoke the complaint against the defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.