The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the operator of a private teaching institute in Speaker-si C, and the victim D is the head of the management office in the “C”.

On April 21, 2018, at the Government-Si around 11:30 on April 21, 2018, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “this spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn, and spawn” to the victim, when the Defendant was aware of his/her interest in the position of the warden in building in the building at the Government-Si.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, it can be acknowledged that a written agreement was submitted to the effect that the defendant shall not be punished on December 13, 2018, which was after the victim instituted the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution shall be dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.