logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.01.23 2013가단110310
어음금
Text

1. Defendant B, C, and D are incorporated with each of the Defendants, and Defendant H and each of the Plaintiff are incorporated with the Defendants, respectively.

a. 68,500.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B (hereinafter “B”), C, D (hereinafter “D”) and H

A. (1) On July 22, 2013, Defendant B issued a promissory note (hereinafter “each of the instant promissory notes”) under Chapter 3 below.

(A) On October 21, 2013, the date of issue 68,500,000 Won C’s face value on July 22, 2013, the date of payment of which is July 21, 2013, the payment date is 63,50,000 Won C’s face value at the lower-class branch of Korea Bank (B) at the payment place at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the payment place at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the date of payment, the date of which is 63,50,000 Won, the date of which is 63,50,000,000 (C) at the lower-class branch of Korea Bank at the payment place at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 22, 2013, the Plaintiff collected a promissory note from each of the Defendant D’s each of the instant payment places at the payment place at Korea, and the Plaintiff collected a protest from each of the Defendant D, the date of which is 23,013.

(3) On July 22, 2013, the Plaintiff, a credit service provider registered for credit business with the name of I, was delivered each of the instant promissory notes to Defendant H for the guarantee of payment of loans. On July 22, 2013, the Plaintiff lent KRW 183,650,000 in total, and KRW 183,650,000 in total, on July 23, 2013, and agreed to receive the face value of each of the instant promissory notes at the due date of each of the instant promissory notes.

(4) On July 26, 2013, the subordinate branch offices of our bank terminated the current account in B, and accordingly, each of the instant promissory notes was refused to be paid in non-transaction.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap 1 to 6, 11 to 14, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. (1) According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B, C, and D are the issuers or endorsers of each of the instant promissory notes, and Defendant H is the final holder, and Defendant H is the same.

arrow