beta
Text
This case shall not be under the jurisdiction of the court.
Reasons
1. On September 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office of Korea in the second floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cbuilding, had the names and weak members of the said office prepare a false complaint on D with respect to D.
A complaint does not have any fact that the complainant borrowed money from the defendant defendant D or made a statement of payment equivalent to KRW 85 million for the defendant defendant at the time when the complainant received a loan because the complainant did not have any good faith to do so, the defendant defendant filed an application for a payment order with the complainant using a statement of payment equivalent to KRW 85 million prepared by the complainant E, and then filed an application for a payment order with the Daegu District Court on January 21, 2010 using the above payment order order and filed an application for a seizure and collection order with the defendant defendant defendant, the debtor, the complainant, and the third debtor F. Accordingly, the defendant filed a claim for collection, winning the lawsuit, and obtained the claim amount amounting to KRW 30 million from the defendant's residence in Daegu District Court on January 21, 1998, and the defendant agreed to pay KRW 85 million from the defendant's residence in Daegu District Court on May 21, 1998 to pay KRW 85 million.5 million.
Nevertheless, the defendant submitted the above complaint to police officers who are not able to know their names in the public service center of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station located in 406, Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the same day.
In this respect, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.
2. Determination
A. The defendant's defense counsel is seeking to transfer the instant case to the Seoul Northern District Court, which has jurisdiction over the place of the instant case and the domicile of the defendant, or to pronounce a judgment of violation of jurisdiction.
B. According to the records, the crime scene of this case or the address, residence or present location of the defendant is not the jurisdiction of this court.
In addition, this case is subject to this.