Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2020. 3. 22. 22:37경 화성시 B 빌딩 앞길에서 ‘음주운전자가 도주하고 있으니 지원하라’는 화성동탄경찰서 지령실의 지령을 받고 출동한 화성동탄경찰서 C지구대 소속 경위 D, 경사 E가, 음주운전으로 체포된 피고인의 아버지가 운전한 고장 난 자동차를 처리하기 위해 현장을 살펴보자 술에 취하여 “내 차인데 왜 살펴보느냐”, “왜 아버지 체포했냐, 나도 체포하라.” 라고 시비를 걸며 경위 D가 순찰차에 탑승하려는 것을 방해하고, 경사 E로부터 위와 같은 행동을 제지당하게 되자, 입고 있던 점퍼를 벗어던지고, “맞짱 한 번 뜨자”라고 말하며 자신의 배로 경사 E의 배를 수회 밀쳤다.

The Defendant continued to take a boom from the police officer F and patrolmen belonging to the same c district c district c district c district c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone c zone cing off

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties in public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, D, and E;

1. A statement of reference witnesses in the G preparation;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act;

1. Selection of selective fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good enough to exercise tangible power against many police officers dispatched by the defendant after receiving 112 reports, and to interfere with performance of official duties.

However, the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime of this case.