The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to the gist of the grounds for appeal, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged in this case on the premise that the defendant was found to have been accompanied by the police officer's voluntary intention prior to the crime in

2. Determination

A. On December 17, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from the Gangdong-gu Seoul Gangdong-gu Ba Public Notice Host Company stating that “I am home from the outside person,” and received a recommendation to return home from D, G, and Singman F of the Seoul Gangseo Police Station C District of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, which called “Catch f, G, E, and F,” and provided an oral urology despite the police officer’s restraint.

The Defendant refused the police officer’s request to disclose his personal information for the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and went to the patrol vehicle by the police officer, and was accompanied to the C district located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. On the same day, around 19:00, the Defendant resisted the imposition of penalties before the C district, and made twice twice the part of the F with the hand-on floor.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention patrol activities and maintenance of public order.

B. According to the records, the lower court: (a) reported on December 17, 2019 112 that police officers D, police officer E, and police officer F, who belong to the Gangnam Police Station in Seoul Dongdong Police Station, reported that “I will not go to the outside person;” and (b) police officers sent out to the Gangdong-gu Seoul Gangdong-gu public notice database in the future; (c) the Defendant, who was residing in the previous public notice hostel in the street before the above public notice hostel, was suffering from disturbance in the state of obscing, fescing, and fescing, requested the Defendant to present his identification card to the Defendant for a disposition of notice on the imposition of penalty against the defect of the old urology in India and the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act caused by the old urology. Police officers are in the state of the Defendant’s personal identification card.