logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2019.05.15 2018가단106322
토지인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the size of 909 square meters in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Incheon, each point of which is indicated in the attached Form No. 13, 14, 15, 16, 13.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff is a 909m20,000 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.

(2) The Defendant is the owner of the instant building (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) and the owner of the building indicated in the attached Table 229 square meters and on the land adjacent to the instant land, Seo-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul.

3) Of the instant land, part 9.0 square meters inboard “C” (hereinafter “instant (C)”) which connects each point of the attached Form Nos. 22, 23, 6, 24, and 22, among the land in this case, are 9.0 square meters in sequence.

[] In the case where the retaining wall owned by the Defendant, which is the basis for the instant building, is located, and among the land in the instant part, the part “A” which connects each point of the items in the attached Form 13, 14, 15, 16, and 13 among the land in the instant part, is 0.3 square meters (hereinafter “the land in the instant item (a)”).

[] On the ground, the board board roof which is a part of the building of this case, and the part "B" in the order of each point of 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 17 of the land of this case among the land of this case, which is part of the building of this case, is 0.6 square meters in part "B" (hereinafter referred to as "land of this case").

[2] On the ground, a part of the instant building, is located in each of the building’s panel and panel’s roofs. 【Written Evidence Nos. 1 and 2 of the grounds for recognition, the result of the request for surveying and appraisal by the appraiser F of the instant court on March 6, 2019, the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant possessed the retaining wall gate installed on the land in the part (c) of this case owned by the Plaintiff and the part (c) of this case, which is part of the land in the part (c) of this case, and the building in this case, which partially infringed upon the land in the part (c) of this case, and possessed without title the land in this case owned by the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the Defendant removed the parts of the instant part of the land and the instant part of the land installed on each ground of the instant part of the land and the instant part of the land installed on each ground of the instant part of the land, and the retaining wall pressle installed on the land of the instant part of the land, and deliver the instant part of the land to the Plaintiff.

arrow