A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

The Defendant, without medical treatment, forged a prescription without a hospital, submitted a prescription to a pharmacy, and had been serving as the head of the counseling office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C gender outdoor department” to purchase pedagogy, which is a tool to restrain food desire containing pentines, which is a native mental medicine.

D upon request from D, four copies of the prescription with which the seal of E, which is the above C Sung-type and the doctor, was affixed.

1. Issuance of a prescription stating drugs for the psychotropic spirit, fabrication of a private document, and uttering of a falsified document;

A. On March 16, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime of March 16, 2018: (a) indicated in the delivery number column “No. 22 on March 16, 2018; (b) written in the column, such as the name of the prescription drug, “A,” and “A,” respectively, in the column of the delivery number, the Defendant forged one copy of the E-name prescription; and (c) forged one copy of the E name in the “I pharmacy” in the “I pharmacy” located in the Dong-gu, Sinsan-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, for the same day.

Accordingly, although the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he issued a prescription stating a local mental medicine, and forged and exercised a prescription under the name of E, which is a private document on the relationship of rights.

B. On April 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) indicated “No. 25 on April 27, 2018,” “A, G” in the item column, such as the name of prescription medicine; and (b) forged a prescription in the name of E by stating “(i) No. 25 on April 27, 2018,” “A, G” in the patient column; and (c) forged a prescription in the name of E; and (b) presented a false prescription in the above “I pharmacy” around the same day by stating that the above prescription is not known.

Accordingly, the defendant is not a narcotics handler.