logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.16 2013고단1628
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant was working as an assistant nurse at Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council Members (Samanium), the Defendant prescribed psychotropic drugs in the name of its president C, and psychotropic drugs in the name of its president, who used the prescription thereof.

1. At around 18:00 on June 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) deducted two copies of a prescription paper in which the name of the victim C was printed and sealed, and then concealed and stolen it in the Defendant’s bank, using the gaps in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected; (b) the name of the victim C, who was kept in the front of the Information Company, was printed and sealed; and (c) the Defendant concealed and stolen it.

2. On November 27, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) around 19:00, at the Defendant’s residence of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 107 Dong-dong 1804; (b) on the column for the personal information of each patient in two copies of the prescription sheet that stolen as stated in paragraph (1), the name and resident registration number of the Defendant and the Defendant’s Nice E are stated in the column for each prescription prescription; (c) on the name of each prescription prescription, the name and the Defendant’s Nice E are indicated as “food, lusium, and string” in the column for each prescription prescription; (d) “1” in each column for administration volume; (e) “2” in each column for administration frequency; and (e) “30 days” in each column for each total number of medication; and (e) st

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged two copies of the prescription in the name of C, which is a private document concerning rights and duties and certification of facts.

3. Although the Defendant should not issue a prescription for psychotropic drugs unless the person handling narcotics is in violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) and should not issue a prescription for psychotropic drugs, the Defendant issued two copies of a prescription stating the name of ingredients as the psychotropic drugs in the same manner as that of paragraph (2) at the same time and in the same manner as that of paragraph (2).

4. The Defendant, at around November 28, 2012, established two copies of the forged prescription as provided in paragraph 2 at the Jung-gu Seoul Central Government, Jung-gu, Seoul. G, who is aware of the fact, is authentic.

arrow