Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant who forged a private document or held the said investigation document was prescribed at the “D Council member” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for a 10 milligrams m (14 milligrams m) and was “the name of prescription medicine ethyl xul 10 mille”

The medical doctor E was given a prescription in the name of the doctor E, stating, “the total number of medication m, 14, and 13 times per day”.

When the Defendant demanded a doctor to additionally prescribe a stroke m, but was rejected, the Defendant copied the above prescription at the nearest phrase stores of the above hospital, and issued the above duplicate prescription to the pharmacist H of the “G pharmacy” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

Accordingly, the defendant forged a prescription, which is a private document, to prove the prescription of the doctor, and uses a forged prescription.

2. Although the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant issued the aforementioned forged prescription at the above G pharmacy at around the time of the day set forth in the above 1.1., and received 14 mm by the stroke mm, which is a local mental medicine.

Accordingly, the defendant purchased a stroke m.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of holding the above investigation document), Articles 61(1)5, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(d) of the Narcotics Control Act (the point of purchasing the roadside m) of the same Act, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The criminal defendant, who has been determined by the method of malm at Pyeongtaek Hospital, needs to be punished corresponding to the crime during the suspension period due to the same kind of crime in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, the defendant is going to work in the region.