logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.09.25 2013고단1594
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

The defendant, using the opportunity to work at a hospital as an assistant nurse, forged a medical prescription in the name of a doctor, presented it to a pharmacy to use it to purchase ethyl ethyl content, which is a kind of exemption from water containing the stroke-mm, which is a stroke-m.

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of falsified investigation documents;

A. On October 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the D Hospital in Jung-gu, Seoul, where the Defendant was working as an assistant nurse, entered “E” in the name column of the medical person prescribed in the prescription slip kept in the hospital by taking advantage of the gaps of doctor’s surveillance; (b) entered the name and resident registration number of F in the patient column; and (c) forged a prescription slip under the name of doctor E, a private document on the certification of facts, stating that “ethyl 10mg” in the name column of prescription prescription; (d) forged a prescription slip under the name of doctor E, which is a private document on the certification of facts; and (e) exercised the said investigation document by presenting the forged prescription slip to the pharmacist who may have knowledge of the fact.

B. On October 22, 2012, at the same place, the Defendant forged a prescription for the preparation of doctor E with the same content as in the same method, and on the same day, at the I pharmacy located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, the Defendant used the relevant investigation document by purchasing ethyl 30 square meters by presenting the forged prescription to the pharmaceuticalJ who is aware of the fact.

C. On November 7, 2012, at the same place, the Defendant forged a prescription slip in the name of doctor E with the same content as the same method, and on the same day, the Defendant purchased ethyl 14 by the said method at the said I pharmacy, thereby exercising the said investigation document.

On December 15, 2012, the Defendant is a patient with a prescription with L’s official seal affixed to the name column of medical personnel by taking advantage of the gaps in which a doctor’s surveillance was neglected.

arrow