logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.04.24 2015고정152
공인중개사법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to run a brokerage business shall register the establishment of a brokerage office with the registration authority having jurisdiction over an area where he/she intends to establish a brokerage office.

The defendant worked from February 2, 2002 to February 2, 2008 as the Gwangjin-si Saemaul Bank B, and thereafter, he is engaged in real estate consulting business and real estate brokerage business with the trade name of C real estate without being registered as a brokerage office in the Mineyang Market, which is the registration authority.

On October 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) without registering the establishment of a brokerage office in the Eelel located in Gwangju-si; and (b) without registering the establishment of a brokerage office in the Eel, the seller was a practicing licensed real estate agent affiliated with C real estate; (c) the seller arranged a contract to sell the total area of 1289.2 square meters of land and the total area of 764.74 square meters of land and the total area of 1,950,000 square meters of land in H and I between F and the buyer Gwangju-si Saemaul Cooperative; and (d) provided a brokerage business by receiving KRW 14 million from the seller F as a brokerage commission on October 22, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F, G, and J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 48 and Article 9 (1) of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant reflects the crime of this case, but it is so decided as per Disposition in consideration of the amount of fees acquired by the defendant.

arrow