logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고단3255
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant asked for the lending of money to E upon the request of the person who will lend money as security at D 101 Do 1502 Do 1502, located near Pyeongtaek-si located near Pyeongtaek-si and asked for the lending of money. However, the above D 101 Do 1502, F entered into a lease contract with a deposit of KRW 130 million and was living there. The above E demanded the tenant to present the detailed statement of the transfer household inspection while demanding the apartment without the tenant as security.

1. Around April 20, 2013, the Defendant forged one copy of a letter of transfer household inspection (including a Dong person) in the name of H in the name of the Defendant’s office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by printing it into the column for entry of the householder and the householder’s name “C, Nov. 23, 2006, a person living together, and a person living together,” without authority under the title “the details of transfer household inspection (including a Dong person)” for the purpose of using computers at the Defendant’s office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. On April 22, 2013, the Defendant used the forged public document “the details of the transferred household perusal (including the same person)”, which is a forged public document, by delivering the forged “the details of the transferred household perusal (including the same person)” to E, as if the document was duly completed, at the office of the K Certified Judicial Scriveners Office of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, 403, as seen in paragraph (1).

3. The fraud defendant borrowed money from the victim E as security at the time and place set forth in paragraph (2). The victim borrowed money from the victim E as security, and the victim "only C and his or her wife took money from the above apartment, and there is no tenant who has a deposit for lease on a deposit basis." The defendant issued a falsified statement of transfer household inspection and documents necessary for the establishment of collateral security and issued them to the victim and on the same day as C account from the victim.

arrow