A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution for fraud at the Suwon District Court Sejong Housing Site Board, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 14, 2012 and is currently under suspended execution.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant, together with B, has forged the detailed statement of the transfer household of the real estate 103 Do 404 Do 103 Do 404, which is owned by the defendant, and had the tenant D reside, but he received the loan in such a way that the tenant did not have the tenant.

1. On August 20, 2012, the Defendant, along with B, drafted two copies of the statement of transfer household inspection, stating “A”, “2012-7-27” and “resident” in the name column of the householder’s name and the first transferor’s name on the date of transfer, in the fireworks where it is difficult to identify the trade name in Pyeongtaek-si-dong, Pyeongtaek-si, which was owned by the Defendant, but the tenant No. 103 404, the tenant No. 103-404, the Defendant was residing, and the Defendant was willing to see the Defendant’s residence.

As a result, the Defendant forged two copies of the statement of transfer household under the name of the head of the Osan-si Dong, Gyeonggi-do, which is an official document for the purpose of uttering in collusion with B.

2. Around August 21, 2012, the Defendant, along with B, presented to E a falsified transfer household inspection statement, as in the preceding paragraph, at a post office located in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, as if he were issued a genuine statement of forgery.

3. On August 20, 2012, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at a certified judicial scrivener office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Student-dong, stating that “I will pay money after three months if I lend money to the victim E as security.”

However, in fact, as of June 4, 2012, the above Carryover No. 103 Dong 404, D were residing as the tenant (the lease deposit amount is KRW 90 million) and it did not actually have the value of collateral, so it would have been sufficiently known to the victim.