A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 10:20 on July 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the victim, who was a d (68 years of age) and E, and F, while drinking together with the said d (68 years of age); (b) while drinking together with the said d (e) and E; and (c) the victim, who was in danger to the victim; and (d) committed assault on the part of the victim twice.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim E (the age of 53) and the victim F (the age of 54) with a view to exposing D, at the time, at the time, at the time, at the place, as described in Paragraph 1, paragraph 1, and in paragraph 1, with a view to breaking the victim E (the age of 53) and the victim E (the age of 54), continuously cutting down the victim F’s ebbb

3. Performance of official duties.

A. The Defendant took a 112-report at the time, place, and place indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, and sent to the site the Defendant at the time and place, “I am feasible, I am feasible, I am the Defendant.” The Defendant took a bath to the above H, “I am a fine of KRW 20 million on the ground that I am fass, I am a police officer, and I am am a dead,” and assaulted the part of the head of the above H one time by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

B. At around 11:00 on July 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) took a bath at the G District District District of the Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; (b) took a flagrant offender arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender; and (c) took the disturbance against the police officer who belongs to the G District of the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the Defendant used the bridge of the said J to take one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on statements made by each police officer in relation to J, H, E, F, and D;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of assault to carry dangerous articles), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act for the crime