logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.12.29 2015고단3022
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 14, 2015, around 23:16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties by police officers B; (b) assaulted the above B’s arms in front of the DNA line located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; (c) “Arrecker fright,” who was sent to the site after receiving 112 reports, and frighted the Defendant, who frighted to the traffic of the persons under the influence of alcohol between B and B belonging to the House E-gu, the Busan High Police Station E zone, which was called to the site; and (d) frighted the Defendant, who frighted, frighted the Defendant’s fright, “frightd, frightd,” and frighted

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

2. At around 00:00 on September 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed an act of obstructing the performance of official duties against police officers F, who was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender for the obstruction of the performance of official duties on the front side of the building in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si; (b) committed an assault on the part of the above F, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul; (c) committed an act of assaulting the Defendant by taking the slope F, who was dispatched to the site upon reporting 112 as described in paragraph (1); and (d) committed an act of assaulting him on the part of the said F, which was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender for the obstruction of the performance of official duties on his own hand; and (d) committed an act of assaulting him on the part of the said F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the accused has led to the confession of a crime; (b) the degree of the assault in this case is not much severe; and (c) the case is contingent under the influence of alcohol.

arrow